Re: [bpfk] polysemy of {nai}

[la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>]

On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:56:05 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Sunday, December 09, 2012 04:07:48 la gleki wrote:
> > 1. {lo zmiku cu na'e xendo} is a false statement. Robots can't be
> > kind/unkind or in the middle of that scale. The scale just cannot be
> > applied.
> > 2. {lo zmiku cu na [ja'e] xendo}={lo zmiku cu na na'e xendo}={lo zmiku cu
> > na to'e xendo} is a true statement. The scale is denied.
>
> lo bifce be la .sfeks. zmiku so'i se tarti .i xu lo bifce be la .sfeks. xendo 
> lo panzi be ri

This is a philosophical question. That I don't want to answer because for me lojban is a live language, and live languages must not have any philosophy.

> Which brings up another question. Does "ri" refer to "lo bifce be la .sfeks." 
> (which is what I meant) or "la .sfeks."? I think it refers to the last finished 
> sumti which is not a personal pronoun, but these two sumti finish at the same 
> point in text.

This is a good question but for another thread.

> Pierre
> -- 
> I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bpfk-list/-/Rz2JMdUMJOcJ.
 
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.