Re: [bpfk] polysemy of {nai}

[John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>]

Pierre Abbat scripsit:

> Which brings up another question. Does "ri" refer to "lo bifce be
> la .sfeks."  (which is what I meant) or "la .sfeks."? I think it
> refers to the last finished sumti which is not a personal pronoun,
> but these two sumti finish at the same point in text.

The former, because it is equivalent to "lo bifce be la sfeks. bei",
and so terminates later.

-- 
Your worships will perhaps be thinking          John Cowan
that it is an easy thing to blow up a dog?      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
[Or] to write a book?
    --Don Quixote, Introduction                 cowan@ccil.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.