Re: [bpfk] extended rafsi and a tosmabru/slinku'i boondoggle

[John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>]

Jorge Llambías scripsit:

> Well, if we throw away rafsi but keep the look-and-feel of brivla, we can
> replace the current 35 rules that deal with brivla with just a single one:

Of course, that puts us back before the 1983 GMR, the purpose of which
was to reduce the number of colliding lujvo.  It's still possible to
have semantic collisions between lujvo coined by different people to mean
different things, but at least they are all decomposable in the same way.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
The Unicode Standard does not encode idiosyncratic, personal, novel,
or private use characters, nor does it encode logos or graphics.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.