[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] extended rafsi and a tosmabru/slinku'i boondoggle


On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
2014-11-16 4:37 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:

  brivla <- !cmevla !cmavo !h &onset unstressed-syllable* stressed-syllable unstressed &post-word

Yes, that's what i wanted. I dont care about the rafsi structure of brivla. Let them remain in peg.

I'm not sure what you mean. If the rafsi structure remains, then this simplified rule won't work. This rule is for a reformed language, it is not a rule that merely hides the rafsi structure.

I just want to explain to noobs  how to detect valid brivla.
If a slinkuhi test needed then it's needed.

The slinku'i test is about rafsi structure. You also have to consider valid forms such as ".eslinku'i" which would break down into two words without the slinku'i test. 

I'm also not against {kibpapri} since it'd be automatically assumed to be expanded into {kibypapri}. va'i I can explain banning voiceless-voiced clusters in a separate rule.

"kibpapri" will be rejected by the phonotactics, but that's not the only function of "y". Compare "bratyrapli" with "bratrapli" for example. One is "bratu zei rapli", the other is "barda zei tarti zei pilno".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.