On 15 Dec 2014 00:06, "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 8:18 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 14 Dec 2014 19:03, "John Cowan" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > As arbitrary prohibitions go, this is nothing compared to the limitations
>> > on initial CCs.
>>
>> If I were actually casting my vote, instead of proxying it to xorxes on the grounds of his sounder judgement, I'd vote to liberalize those initial clusters too. (And it would even not invalidate any prior usage.)
>
> Depending on which limitations we're talking about, it would invalidate some usage. For example, if "ks" was to become a valid initial, then the fu'ivla "leksiko" would no longer be a valid fu'ivla, it would become "le ksiko".
Hmm. I suppose that to preserve validity of prior usage, you'd have to say that a word can't start with /ks/ but can start with /.ks/.
--And.
--