This is reminder and interim report.
The poll will be closed on 2014-12-27 at 0:00 UTC (it might be a few hours later depending on my connection to the Internet.)
http://goo.gl/forms/5KbiK5yBky
Currently, "2. disallow CgV in cmevla/fu'ivla/ma'ovla" is predominant.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1kJLBvjkoDpmvA9vJS_lf8SpCYAZvY4bMx1pj8uhWqRs/viewanalytics
As a supporter of "1.3.1. allow CgV in cmevla, disallow it in fu'ivla/ma'ovla", I make a comment here:
CgV in cmevla does not affect lexical analysis, while that in fu'ivla/ma'ovla does. Disallowing CgV in cmevla is very strong restriction. It affects not only traditional names like {nitcion}, or popular names like {tuitr}, but also a standard of lojbanization of words of natural languages. CgV in cmevla sometimes makes things easy. For example, many Chinese names have CgV-like phoneme strings. Chinese "Huan", "Han" and "Hu An" are distinguished from each other. If CgV is disallowed in cmevla, it will be difficult to find out a reasonable standard of lojbanization of them.
mu'o