[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form



The preprocessor thing doesn't make a ton of sense to me. Does anyone else support this "dialectal variation"? We don't preprocess {ie} to {i'e}, so I don't see the point in changing ?{jie} to {ji'e}. They're quite different sounds, and moreover different syllable counts, so you'll be complecting the stress and word segmentation rules as well as breaking audiovisual isomorphism.

As for the larger question, I don't have a very strong opinion. I lean towards consistency (that would be banning it or allowing it everywhere). If we do allow it, maybe the sibilants should still be an exception for ease of pronunciation (I don't have trouble with ?{guaspi}, but ?{jiespi} and ?{ciaspi} are difficult).

So if we're approval-voting: 1.1.2 + 2. But I'm open to being convinced otherwise.

mu'o mi'e la durkavore

On Thursday, December 11, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:



2014-12-11 16:16 GMT+03:00 John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>:
Gleki Arxokuna scripsit:

> I vote for this. + I prefer it to be just a synonym (dialect variation of
> the same sequence but with a {'} inside. co'o zo guaspi

I can live with this, but I'd prefer to ban it altogether.

It depends on in what way should it be banned. 
I vote for banning it from the formal grammar however, I vote for the preprocessor to be able to autocorrect {jie} back to {ji'e}. Speech recognition must be able to recognize both variants.


--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
Clear?  Huh!  Why a four-year-old child could understand this report.
Run out and find me a four-year-old child.  I can't make head or tail
out of it.        --Rufus T. Firefly on government reports

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.