[jbovlaste] Re: Music terminology

["A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>]

----- Original Message ----
> From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
> To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
> Sent: Wed, March 30, 2011 1:04:42 PM
> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Music terminology
> 
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:11 PM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
> 
> >>
> >> > 3) ninzgi
> >> > z1=n1 the pop music performed at/by z2 (event)
> >>
> >> There are many forms of music that have been new and innovative but
> >> aren't classified as pop (e.g. glitch).
> >
> > I'm not crazy about this one either, and I hope someone suggests a better
> > alternative.
> > The justification for it is the fact that popular music doesn't last long.
> > Yes, other forms of music an be new, but that should not be a problem.
> 
>   If it's "non-long-lastingness" which is your justification, why not zasyzgi 
?
>     
Possibly, though I was also considering sorselneizgi
 
mu'o mi'e .totus.
 
> 
>