[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] zu'edji
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] zu'edji
- From: Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:53:48 -0400
- Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:55:03 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BRhaCXiHTT+diLGY1CGcXWkUiDzOgeoLJNzT1e9E1m0=; b=PpcCdWmIUK/pMC/rHkiHWAXMGA+FOOGuUJWE0D9W4VXx4xMilxolzWnN+St7SY3nYT 48Q7rObinETpuDf3jWW9muYlOhwx/1jLX0ihhxzAasDmD0reQmilLESear1/k5kiTA39 DU9/8mEStreoGB1vS+9MOKKSacqg6SblqXuAM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=eTKHHQLFSYHx5F4GREqDcrhdMsjJttTWYoUVduFv9Ov1Qxy9tKt47UxRFotT+9Lf/e zI8EmGGsuwBwD0PQeOcS4n4ff01/dnupkp/NLOqzmg8qKMYHTjiXnXn0zw5VeJO7/+hd WB2/13CNzIcvUOA4koOfH4JWsZLa44VRAWZ0w=
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
I think I actually may have taken some part in defining this word:
Word: zu'edji [jbovlaste]
Type: lujvo
Gloss Word: intend in the sense of "wish to do"
Gloss Word: pretend in the sense of "wish to do"
Definition: z1 intends/wishes to do z2 for z3.
Place Keywords:
1. pretender in the sense of "someone who wishes to do something"
2. pretention
But could somebody remind me why "intend" is a gloss for zu'edji. When tax season comes around I "intend" to get my taxes done but I really don't desire to do them. People intend to do all kinds of things that they really don't djica/desire/want/wish to have happen. Also the "for z3" is kind of ambiguous. I'm assuming that it means "for purpose/towards end z3" but it's not clear.
I propose changing the definition of {zu'edji} just a bit so that instead of:
Definition: z1 intends/wishes to do z2 for z3
we have:
Definition: z1 wishes/desires to do z2 for purpose z3
and create a new lujvo: {zukpla} with a definition like:
Definition: z1 intends/plans to do z2 (event) for purpose z3
Thoughts and opinions?
Also, how easy/not is it to modify an existing definition? Would there need to be a whole new definition made and up-voted and then just down-vote this definition? Because that seems excessive and maybe not worth it.