[jbovlaste] Re: new word: prolijmo'a

[Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com>]

de'i li 28 pi'e 02 pi'e 2010 la'o fy. Luke Bergen .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra.
> In coming up with that example, though, I realized something.  Most games
> will be made with fu'ivla.  Is it legal to make a lujvo from a rafsi +
> fu'ivla like {caxmatikelta'o} = chess board?
.skamyxatra

A {rafsi} and a {fu'ivla} together would make another {fu'ivla}, assuming that
the compound adheres to all of the {fu'ivla} morphology rules.  You cannot make
a {lujvo} (as it is defined for the purposes of Lojban morphology) from a
{fu'ivla} unless you use a {rafsi fu'ivla} as described in section 4.16 of the
CLL, but I don't think that feature ever got close to being an official part of
the language anyway.  However, I'm pretty sure that "{caxmatikelta'o}" (which
is neither a {rafsi} + {fu'ivla} compound nor a potential {rafsi fu'ivla}) is a
valid {fu'ivla}, even though you probably weren't trying to make it so.

mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun.

-- 
le munje vi smaji