[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 13
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 13
- From: "A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivery-date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:50:42 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1286754576; bh=xIcZ0E4ffh1STv/gxLPtCwLQOHwhy8jpjSVMNXI8/pg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GseJE/xqBlNW4zD7y14SDO3rz7GedgNWzeLtzGP/Vf0i5f7Z5u3bSFOOMd+aYPeK4RJNQE+iF3NZLk2P1VYKIBMBxfyGp4uJbmnEG727mQwxxUn9fKQKattrPk/a7/z5+ipcjt9GtVtXTpNRf7/1RxnK/z+4oUFNTtBXS+mONrc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=S79dc5DNDPUKjMsgFwqp+SdETVDCAXI1LrKSVVLQ0tmGnN6nU+nJbtnF1Jjo2yfdf7mkmd/+S2t/wtx4mlhGpD++avbNKtJhN9dyImllg4yHgFhcsjzHOxrjacKZ/36Uh+TI9MCXGlI1KPVRyI8Wc8tUWGyGZ30M0ckgsSKnL1E=;
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=MZCxPQFQemZnrQ7J=Xfjfe+-cMKeV5axwvgYa@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <591650.39541.qm@web88008.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <AANLkTi=vxOkWgJ+o+=KEhLxbKhCFYOZg=wE2CnXxLGuh@mail.gmail.com> <904926.62018.qm@web88007.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <AANLkTi=MZCxPQFQemZnrQ7J=Xfjfe+-cMKeV5axwvgYa@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
----- Original Message ----
> From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
> To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
> Sent: Sun, October 10, 2010 2:48:43 PM
> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 13
>
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:39 PM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
> >>
> > But isn't {danfu} already a solution i.e. a remedy? Thats why I was trying
>to
> > treat the {tadji} part as 'coming up iwth a remedy'.
>
> "danfu" would normally work perfectly for "remedy", but read the
> context. The Dodo is using pointlessly obfuscating language to say
> basically nothing, that's the reason for the silly "daftadji". The
> next line is someone telling him "ko tavla bau la lojban".
>
Ok. But then there's no point in defining a lujvo for it in jbovlaste.
This was a 'one time' lijvo.
totus