[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: fu'ivla for liquors
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: fu'ivla for liquors
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@pobox.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:03:08 -0500
- Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:04:43 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=3TRFv0Yysjioo9oQcKzoLS+hupXrV2Rdf0ZaGmXNl5Y=; b=hkYf2LUqrxmU3Gp5HrPvn4yGI1jasaD4J+ghDJN/fDw7iWnqLRgfRNPx+72LVg34ch magKBxD+D6UTR68PtLMgZ/9hCLYa7QchKgdNRXRbawaSfH8NnetAsxJBQt5wTX4Rxl8u VdHTheQBZPE1Na2qtPTO3IjWJ4l6AZJmr0kQk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=R7jY0YT64KFrt0d27bAztXV8Bh1ln5iIgAxOzTvSsFGJ9iJ6ZUhnf9swxq3r8rFTLO dr3FNmjTGc2oHV7aN+XSHud9lWV9LhW2HNstD65n88ShY8vABoRGEJhEefsjTyijUVa/ aWsv8L3UUUijHE+nD3BncedPLB8Y15NIAWuEg=
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <20101123224830.GV8367@nvg.org>
- References: <770898.27481.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <AANLkTime0YRY6=TJM_yAGVMgB4MbCHMN7-9XeYo5j6Ge@mail.gmail.com> <20101123224830.GV8367@nvg.org>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:36:18PM -0500, Craig Daniel wrote:
>
>> .uiski is invalid (because ski is the rafsi for skicu, so a cup of
>> whiskey would become a delightful description-cup),
>
> {uiski} is not a valid lujvo because *-ui- doesn't have rafsi form. So {uiski} is in fact a well-formed type 4 fu'ivla.
The first sentence there is true, obviously. The fu'ivla appears to
nonetheless fail a sort of backwards slinku'i test, in that ".uiski
kabri" falls apart into ".ui skikabri," and "skikabri" is a valid
lujvo.