[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Emperor
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Emperor
- From: "A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 06:17:39 -0800 (PST)
- Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 06:19:26 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1293718659; bh=5SD8EO43jQypjPMfDQWC/SQLJMBhTEGWyZK8I3sFMeg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=TJZL5BaDRMYVee+RXzPYsK4v8EZ0bts1JpARSvyfZ5aeMKiMV7yZty1miRGb1Clkhcz1HYE91JUi3LMDUb1oGdj8YKKPL5JCc0M4zEymeEpDdRGMZgKmLJhyWBtgRT+hwVjRkqiClmSE8cdbvX3z0PgosF+Vi1A1BMECih7exJ4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GvYmGbw5NE0xZrDJ1IgoPtSXniHBw3kSaPL4Ho14lmnbMzLj9SccaFvEEdh3n/6vxzstlW7X9cI+DsQHrY1gdUMrWOJmJCo78FxAETi7prO0b1COVllt86anahd8c4EB+wB3rOAjXWxY33y974dtotvZ+wwLM28oQbLvXPirzPk=;
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
coi ro do
Please comment
t1=n1 is the emperor/empress of t2
t1=n1 balnolraitru t2
Actually, I prefer {balnolrai} as emperors, like kings,
may be ceremonial only. However, the proposed
definition would be consistent with the most used
lujvo for 'king/queen' which is {nolraitru} rather
than {nolrai].
For comparison, jbovlaste already has:
president: {gugja'a]
premier/prime minister: {truralju}
totus