On 12/1/06, Timo Paulssen <timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote:
> > This means that both
> > right and wrong reviews will get mixed up without any means to comment
> > and/or challenge the reviews. Anyone should have the opportunity to
> > post comments on any review and the translator should have the option
> > to challenge the review while explaining why is he/she doing the
> > challenging. Since jboselkei in it's current form does not provide for
> > this, then it mixes up right and wrong reviews indiscriminately,
> > making it an unreliable source of learning material.
>
> you can of course always look at the Value of a review, which is
> calculated from the score of the user that did the review.
I have thought on this, but it seems to me that the score has some
degree of uncertainty about the value of the review. That uncertainty
does not live up to my standards.
> > I regarded such an implementation to be top priority over anything
> > else, I went eagerly to see what changes were made. Boy, I was so
> > disappointed. The looks and feel of the game seemed to be top priority
> > rather than improving it's usefulness as a learning tool.
>
> well, actually i was only called to action by eppcott because he had a
> design that he wanted to be implemented and i did just that...
> and basically i have to apologise for my dukse lazni ness, but part of
> it is caused by my disliking of the uglyness of PHP.
OK