Of course, that makes the note names longer than they are in any language, but we really don't need it. strings of note-names could always be quoted.
On 10/26/07, Mike Zink <zuwiki@gmail.com> wrote:
The do-re-mi scheme would be nice, but wouldn't it just create a whole lot of ambiguities? In fact, all of those first three are already Lojban words.
On 10/25/07,
Yoav Nir <yoav.nir@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure. The do-re-mi scheme works well with tonal music. So does the A-B-C scheme.
I believe these schemes are used around the world. Any reason why we should opt for something completely different?
On 10/26/07, james riley <
jimr1603@gmail.com> wrote:
I like it. The children of lojbanistan can learn their notes and their numbers at the same time!
On 25/10/2007,
Penguino <
spheniscine@gmail.com> wrote:On second though, perhaps C should be
no. That way intervals can be calculated in mod-12 arithmetic?
C - no
C#/Db - pa
D - re
D#/Eb - ci
E - vo
F - mu
F#/Gb - xa
G - ze
G#/Ab - bi
A - so
A#/Bb - dau
B - fei
- Mike Zink