[lojban-beginners] Re: Strange modals

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Dec 2, 2007 3:30 AM, Penguino <spheniscine@gmail.com> wrote:
> The ma'oste says that di'o alone can be used to mean "at the locus of
> (object)".

I think the differene between di'o and sedi'o is that {X di'o Y} says that
X occurs at the place where Y is confined, whereas {X sedi'o Y} says
that X occurs at, and is confined to, place Y. They differ as to what is
confined.

Similarly, {X tu'i Y} says that X occurs permanently at location Y, whereas
{X setu'i Y} says that X occurs at the place where Y is permanently located.
They differ as to what is permanently located there.

mu'o mi'e xorxes