[lojban-beginners] Re: zo bo

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On 4/1/08, Vid Sintef <picos.picos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Must {nau} and PU in {gi'e -tense- bo} always behave as a connective?

Yes, the whole construct up to the {bo} constitutes the connective.

> In {mi do pu nelci gi'e nau bo prami}, why is {nau} seen as a
> connective while the two bridi are already logically connected by
> {gi'e}?

It's the extended connective {gi'e nau bo} that connects the two
bridi-tails, not just {gi'e}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes