[lojban-beginners] Re: zo bo

["Vid Sintef" <picos.picos@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
>  In {gi'e -tense- bo} the tense acts as a connective
>  between two bridi

Does that mean that such a tense has no internal sumti like the one in
{pu [sumti] ku mi nelci do}?

> the function of {nau} as
>  connective is not specified.

Since {nau} is always an absolute "reference point", does it not
clearly tell an absolute perspective of the tenses of the connected
bridi?

mi'e vid