On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Jorge LlambÃas
<jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:33 PM, paskal. kos <
pascal.akihiko@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/12/16 Jorge LlambÃas <
jjllambias@gmail.com>:
>> ta na (sutra citka ro badna)
>> That one did not quickly eat all bananas.
>
> "ta" isn't included?
Contrariwise, I maintain that, with "na" rather than "naku", it does include the "ta". As it says in the reference grammar, chapter 15, section 2. I concede that it might create messes with su'o+gi'e sentences. But that's what the grammar says.
--gejyspa