[lojban-beginners] Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

Oh *for fuck's sake*.  I'm getting them at the bounce address; I had
no idea it was coming to the list.

Unfortunately, there *are* no synx.us.to addresses subscribed.  I've
put all addresses with "synx" in them on vacation; hopefully that'll
fix it.

-Robin

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:10:50AM -0400, Luke Bergen wrote:
> is anybody else getting these?
> 
> - Luke Bergen
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Mail Delivery System <
> MAILER-DAEMON@synx.us.to> wrote:
> 
> > This is the mail system at host synx.us.to.
> >
> > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> > be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
> >
> > For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
> >
> > If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> > delete your own text from the attached returned message.
> >
> >                   The mail system
> >
> > <synx@synx.us.to> (expanded from <lists@synx.us.to>): temporary failure.
> >    Command output: connect: No such file or directory
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822; synx@synx.us.to
> > Original-Recipient: rfc822;lists@synx.us.to <rfc822%3Blists@synx.us.to>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 4.3.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: x-unix; connect: No such file or directory
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>
> > To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:11:39 -0400
> > Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: vreta
> > I see.  So like most things lojban, you can't count on the "approximate
> > english equivalent" to be at all regular or normal.  eg. "___ing = nu ____"
> > is not always (or even usually) a good generalization.
> >
> > - Luke Bergen
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tuesday 10 March 2009 18:17:28 Minimiscience wrote:
> >> > The problem is that, in English, the present participle of a verb (the
> >> form
> >> > used, among other places, in the progressive form, e.g., "Zoe is
> >> ____ing")
> >> > is the same as the gerund (the form used in a noun phrase corresponding
> >> to
> >> > Lojban "{nu}").
> >>
> >> A few centuries ago, they weren't: the participle ended in "-ind". In
> >> German
> >> they end in "-end" and "-ung".
> >>
> >> Pierre
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >

-- 
They say:  "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons."
And I'm thinking:  "Does it even occur to you to try for something
other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/