[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender



hmmm.... just how would one say "for fuck's sake"?

... mu'i lo nu la gletu kanro

or maybe something like ".oisai ko gletu mi tu'i lo kerlo" would be more in the spirit of the phrase.

- Luke Bergen


On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
Oh *for fuck's sake*.  I'm getting them at the bounce address; I had
no idea it was coming to the list.

Unfortunately, there *are* no synx.us.to addresses subscribed.  I've
put all addresses with "synx" in them on vacation; hopefully that'll
fix it.

-Robin

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:10:50AM -0400, Luke Bergen wrote:
> is anybody else getting these?
>
> - Luke Bergen
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Mail Delivery System <
> MAILER-DAEMON@synx.us.to> wrote:
>
> > This is the mail system at host synx.us.to.
> >
> > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> > be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
> >
> > For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
> >
> > If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> > delete your own text from the attached returned message.
> >
> >                   The mail system
> >
> > <synx@synx.us.to> (expanded from <lists@synx.us.to>): temporary failure.
> >    Command output: connect: No such file or directory
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822; synx@synx.us.to
> > Original-Recipient: rfc822;lists@synx.us.to <rfc822%3Blists@synx.us.to>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 4.3.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: x-unix; connect: No such file or directory
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>
> > To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:11:39 -0400
> > Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: vreta
> > I see.  So like most things lojban, you can't count on the "approximate
> > english equivalent" to be at all regular or normal.  eg. "___ing = nu ____"
> > is not always (or even usually) a good generalization.
> >
> > - Luke Bergen
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tuesday 10 March 2009 18:17:28 Minimiscience wrote:
> >> > The problem is that, in English, the present participle of a verb (the
> >> form
> >> > used, among other places, in the progressive form, e.g., "Zoe is
> >> ____ing")
> >> > is the same as the gerund (the form used in a noun phrase corresponding
> >> to
> >> > Lojban "{nu}").
> >>
> >> A few centuries ago, they weren't: the participle ended in "-ind". In
> >> German
> >> they end in "-end" and "-ung".
> >>
> >> Pierre
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >

--
They say:  "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons."
And I'm thinking:  "Does it even occur to you to try for something
other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/