[lojban-beginners] Re: la'e di'u

[MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com]

In a message dated 4/1/2009 13:39:48 Eastern Daylight Time, mturniansky@gmail.com writes:


> la jon na zanfri lo nu rokci cpare (or "cpare lo rokci" to be more
> precise) .iku'i jy  (NOT "la jy". "jy" is already a sumti by itself,
> "J") zukte lo se go'i
>
>   Let's go through this step by step:
> la jon <-- x1 of "nelci"
> na <-- "not",  negates the whole bridi
> zanfri <-- "enjoys"
> lo nu cpare lo rokci <- "rock climbing", the x2 of zanfri
> .i  <-- sentence break
> jy <-- "J", the x1 of zukte, refers back to "la jon"
> zukte <-- "does act"
> lo se go'i <-- the x2 of the previous bridi, which is now the x2 of
> this sentence
>
>            --gejyspa


You left out "ku'i" after ".i".  How does that fit in?

stevo