[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: comment structure
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: comment structure
- From: Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:01:18 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=B6hIzkYVjdUz5yXG5i0tE8w1iTvXmx0RVX80kt4e1hM=; b=jJVlROH3pnrH0T/pmstiIp3jb0QG4qWZvebXJo2LCsSpj32tDwFJcHJTBSgwPUKIn+ +uihp7uB2aCFiyK6bPCcbaZhzymE0QODDSSSuwt/Vlnt8gMqA2fEkbOzKWv6xORCQmXM 8rQTVeRxpAb65CvuaXKAZflaOdFDfjyBU+09c=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=Qx3Qbs59sRmdJTxqc/tx22rEmvwkfaZX6m/kxm8cySktaAPrwzEW0zH+jeM/yil/Jb gi2kCP+QQh1/KuPZ2pQytpoyJ42bmBTAZueW1j3bpOr94jj3g9dV+hLWu+Htim90a6Zc XhMaFvdnSJ8eTLN+LskNgkqgBbmyh97mR9QSw=
- In-reply-to: <23f4e3390906200212j5dc389c5i87ee3bd22ac56a9a@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <23f4e3390906200212j5dc389c5i87ee3bd22ac56a9a@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
de'i li 20 pi'e 06 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. David Gowers .fy. cusku zoi
skamyxatra.
> I was writing about a numeric encoding system and eventually wrote
this:
>
> li no ga'o bi'o ga'o vo nosomu pi sososomupapazepabizemu cu nacyja'e
> sekai le papamei jetka'usatci va'i se'i li pa fi'u renovobi
>
> in English:
> numeric-result is in range [0 .. 4095.99951171875].
> with-property 11 bit-precision - in other words 1 / 2048
...
> Is this appropriate? 'and in other words 1/2048' seems still a bit
odd.
> I really just want to specify '11 bit-precision, in other words
> 1/2048'; is that un-lojbanic or am I just ignorant ? :)
.skamyxatra
"{va'i}" and "{se'i}" both belong to {selma'o} UI, so they act as
attitudinals/indicators and do not start new structures; thus, "{li pa
fi'u renovobi}" simply fills the x2 place of "{nacyja'e}." I think
the suggested way to say what you're trying to say is with a
parenthetical: "... {sekai le papamei jetka'usatci to va'i se'i li pa
fi'u renovobi toi}."
mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun.
--
do la terjvi ganai pensi gi fliba