[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: proper pronunciation of apostrophe
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: proper pronunciation of apostrophe
- From: Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:20:26 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OL9AnPXiIaaAa6dvUK/3iQGrTMFL62rChR8whvZXDTY=; b=KCrtAddzO1NvUrUJPcYDsfGBTrMyAyR2Z+Q4FFJSG9UogQvH5xz9DWDAwcFmxrsVdq GWYvphZaFvysIUu5IBn+oybMkHhH6wbrSxcb4QJJ1WQmggzErEDCvKsSNpxhCYvkG7qY 9XkKBv7MM6gnSwtVOcwaEbjwR0gro5zvfmaUw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=c47XaD2g++bx3UKxv5d3Xad55i299Lu6qPWar/lt6b43nEYZzhw2urpvFlR+yCUmaV riqgA566gdpxsb40kvfX9Hr6HutJoZdOiQjG+LR8xWX1V2skfNuE88/cn7iwvmXPJ7N9 M9eAHYwtPobZQa4KFJ50nvFPqjpkMZFKPIXHg=
- In-reply-to: <20090821032239.GA12245@sdf.lonestar.org>
- References: <cab.4e293c84.37bf6a22@wmconnect.com> <20090821032239.GA12245@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:22, Minimiscience<minimiscience@gmail.com> wrote:
> de'i li 20 pi'e 08 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com .fy. cusku
> zoi skamyxatra.
>> So will lots of other people who use the terms for different things,
>> including English speakers who use it for the different between the two main
>> sounds of "c" and "g" (hard = k/g, soft = s/j).
> .skamyxatra
>
> I wasn't using "hard" and "soft" as stand-ins for "voiced" and "unvoiced"; I
> was simply trying to describe the different pronunciations of English "th" to
> someone I had no reason to presume was already familiar with the technical
> aspects of phonetics.
And it was pointed out that your use of those terms possibly caused
more confusion than had you simply omitted them entirely.
>ÂHow do you think I should have described [Î] and [Ã]?
As {"th" as in "thing"} and {"th" as in "this"}, for example.
mu'o mi'e .filip.
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>