[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation

To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:04:17 -0400
In-reply-to: <96f789a60910050447q7f476f89mda57aa07f9ac1607@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7f1d42860910021120n1033c6a3wbef9131c23f2c9a0@mail.gmail.com> <27513e550910022003g4c4bb780s8c36f55c805feba0@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a60910050447q7f476f89mda57aa07f9ac1607@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)

On Monday 05 October 2009 07:47:41 Michael Turniansky wrote:
>   The most literal translation of the English is "mi pu noroi viska da
> poi na se nelci be mi" (I have up-to-now 0-times seen something which
> it was not true it is liked by me)

Why is "pu noroi viska" grammatical, but not "noroi pu viska"?

Pierre

Follow-Ups:
- [lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation
  - From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

References:
- [lojban-beginners] using 'se' in conversation
  - From: Ryan Leach <rsw.leach@gmail.com>
- [lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation
  - From: Oren <get.oren@gmail.com>
- [lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation
  - From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation
Next by Date: [lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation
Previous by thread: [lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation
Next by thread: [lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread