[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: Tenses in abstractions



>You wouldn't normally use a ZI without a PU though

Yeah, I was trying to keep PU out of it since I believe you said that that DOES behave like it describes in the CLL.  I'm still confused by what "I eat the apple an event of me sleeping ago" means.  It doesn't read like any english I've ever seen.  How do the event of my eating the apple and the event of me sleeping relate in time and space according to how I used {za} (from your perspective).

Sorry for harping on this, I just want to really understand it.

Is all of this described in the tag proposal or is this different way of using VI/ZA part of some other proposal?  Or is it just how people have been using it?

2010/2/27 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, so, what you're describing, xorxes, is something different from the CLL
> I think.  I thought I always understood VA/ZI as sumtcita but I guess not.
>  The CLL version I understand to mean that {mi citka lo plise za lo nu mi
> sipna} means "I eat the apple a medium time distance from the event of me
> sleeping".  Could you explain what {mi citka lo plise za lo nu mi sipna}
> means under your understanding of VA/ZI sumtcita, xorxes?

"I eat the apple an event of me sleeping ago", or  "I eat the apple an
event of me sleeping from now". You wouldn't normally use a ZI without
a PU though, because the difference between "ago" and "hence" is
pretty drastic. The case of VA is a bit different because in space the
direction sometimes can be irrelevant.

> Thanks.
> P.S.  It's a little disconcerting that I've been learning lojban for over a
> year now and have been using VA/ZI sumtcita like the CLL describes them
> without ever hearing of another way to use them.

Do you use them or see them used like that very often? In the CLL
sense they don't seem to have a lot of use (as sumtcita). As I said,
the only one I really see used as sumtcita in the CLL sense is "vi",
but even then mostly with the sense of "bu'u". Even the example that
started this:

> would {zi ma do co'a sipna ca lo prulamcte } also be valid?

doesn't really make that much sense, since you were asking about the
time of falling asleep, not about some short time before or after it.

> When are we going to get
> an updated version of the CLL with all the errata/xorlo/dotside/anything
> else that's come out of BPFK?

Everything the BPFK has produced is already available online:

http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Sections

> Or at the very least an "official" page of
> some sort with all of the official changes that have been made from the CLL?

No official changes have been made from the CLL, but there is a CLL errata page:

http://www.lojban.org/tiki/CLL,+aka+Reference+Grammar,+Errata

>  Or even less, can we get a page with all the changes that "usage has
> decided" are part of lojban?

You can always start one, but how do we determine what usage has decided?

mu'o mi'e xorxes