[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Honorifics.
On 8 December 2011 09:51, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/12/8 Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>:
>> What about {no'u}/{po'u} with the current grammar?
>> {lo [.io] nanmu po'u la .bin.}
> I'm not sure if {po'u} or {poi du} would work in this case. It might
> work when addressing a body with multiple personalities:
>
> lo .io nanmu po'u la .supyman.
> Mr. Superman (not Clark Kent)
>
> (We wouldn't have to do that for Dr. Jekyll / Mr. Hyde.)
>
ue, as I understand {noi} and {poi}, the former would only make
sense when there is only one Mr. in the room, va'i when
{lo .io nanmu} is not considered specific enough.
ta'o what is the state of this cmevla as brivla proposition?
mu'o
mi'e .asiz.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.