[lojban-beginners] Re: how correct is this phrase

[Dank <dankaivel@gmail.com>]

it means what it says,

seprije could probably go as well as selprije.

i know gasnu is an agent, so i am agree that if the sumti start with
lo, it has to be a person or an agent. But since i am using "le" i was
hoping that any kind of stuff can go in there, any abstraction or
bridi starting with "le", since i supose "le" is to say that i
describe the thing this way, so it should be to describe in almost any
way

about using condi, since is in "le" i guess is allowed to use deepness
as a descriptor,  regardless of whatever it might mean deep as a
descriptor of sanji

Anyway, if the phrase is not correct, how could the same thing can be
said in another way???


On 17 dic, 00:26, Pierre Abbat <p...@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> On Saturday 17 December 2011 01:08:06 Dank wrote:
>
> > hi, i was just wondering how correct is this phrase,
>
> > le nu condi sanji pensi cu gasnu le banli seprije
>
> It's syntactically correct, though I'm not sure what it means.
> *"seprije" is run together. We normally don't run words together unless all of
> them are cmavo.
> *The subject of "gasnu" is an agent; you have an abstraction (which is like a
> subordinate clause) there. "le pensi cu gasnu" makes sense.
> *Are you talking about thoughts of deep-sea divers?
>
> Pierre
>
> --
> Don't buy a French car in Holland. It may be a citroen.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.