I don't think {ce} should be used anywhere outside "(set)" places (or
similar). The set of balls does not have properties of balls, it has
properties of a set. A set of people doesn't join a circus; people do.
And honestly I'm not half sure what {ce} exactly does as a tanru
connective. In fact there are no tanru connectives with this property
(I mean, "lo ka mi xadba zo'o jimpe ce'u").
http://dag.github.com/cll/6/4/
"Lojban speakers should generally think twice before employing the set
descriptors."
mu'o mi'e ianek
On 13 Lip, 15:04, selpa'i <m...@plasmatix.com> wrote:
Indeed, but the problem is that lindar used ke instead of ke'e.
The sentence he intended was:
le ke clani traji ke'e ce ke tordu traji ke'e nanmu ku co'e
To get the following structure:
le (ke clani traji ke'e) ce (ke tordu traji ke'e) nanmu ku co'e
mu'o mi'e la selpa'i
Am 13.07.2012 14:51, schrieb .arpis.:> Doesn't parse; jbofi'e doesn't like the {ce} after the {ke}.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Lindar <lindartheb...@gmail.com
<mailto:lindartheb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
le ke clani traji ke ce ke tordu traji ke nanmu ku co'e
I win. =D
--
.i pau mi me ma .i pa mai ko mi jungau la'e di'u
.i ba bo mi va'o lo nu nelci lo nu me ma kau cu barkla
.i va'o lo nu na nelci cu denpa ti lo nu mi drata