On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 06:51:15PM -0700, ianek wrote:
> > {.i lo ba'e se bunda be lo do mamta be'o banzu lonu galfi fa lonu vo'a zutse
> > lo vipci'e pe li re kei vy. lo porsi}
>
> pe'i neither {bunda} nor {se bunda} is what you want here. x1 of bunda
> is some weight (or possibly an object?) and x2 is a number (of local
> units of weight representing the weight). So "lo bunda be X" implies
> that X is a number and "lo se bunda" is a number. I can't tell why
> would you want local units at all. A correct way is to use {junta}: x1
> is the weight of object x2 in [gravitational or other force] field x3.
> {lo junta be lo do mamta} etc.
You're mostly right. I didn't know about {junta} and found {bunda} first.
There is a second (unofficial) definition of {bunda} in jbovlaste that
changed it from the baseline: {x1} weighs {x2} units ..
That's the one I used, that's why I think my wording is also valid (though
using {junta} is much better)
v4hn
Attachment:
pgpJdKZjg0RLL.pgp
Description: PGP signature