Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Why no "about" brivla?

[Sebastian <so.cool.ogi@gmail.com>]

Could you say that {srana} is a gismu-equivalent of {pe}? But perhaps with a bit more asymmetrric relation between x1 and x2, as the note for {srana} suggest?

In either case I think it's not wrong to say that dedication is a form of "associated with". Still {srana} and {pe} is definitely vaguer than "dedication", so maybe a lujvo would be more approriate?

mu'omi'e jongausib

Skickat från min iPhone

5 dec 2012 kl. 17:44 skrev tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>:

> On 4 December 2012 22:45, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:29 PM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Still, "x1 is dedicated to x2" is a kind of relation, just as "x1
>>> plans x2 for process x3" (platu) is.
>> 
>> 
>> Yes, but neither of those are srana.
> 
> If "x1 is dedicated to x2" wasn't a subset of {srana}, of "x1 is
> related to x2", then it couldn't be covered by {pe} either -- we
> couldn't say {lo cukta pe lo nixli} to imply that the book is
> dedicated to the girl. Do we actually have such a restriction?
> 
> 
> mu'o
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.