On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:44 AM, tijlan
<jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Still, "x1 is dedicated to x2" is a kind of relation, just as "x1
>> plans x2 for process x3" (platu) is.
>
>
> Yes, but neither of those are srana.
If "x1 is dedicated to x2" wasn't a subset of {srana}, of "x1 is
related to x2", then it couldn't be covered by {pe} either -- we
couldn't say {lo cukta pe lo nixli} to imply that the book is
dedicated to the girl. Do we actually have such a restriction?
My opinion is yes, but I won't go so far as to say my opinion is the official one without agreement from a majority of jbocertu.