On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com> wrote:On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
You've got it backwards :P It's {rodme'a} -> {mleca fi lo ka broda}. In your example, the tertau of the veljvo suddenly became the seltau of the actual meaning; that usually indicates naljvajvoNot necessarily. A lujvo means what the lujvo maker makes it mean once you define its structure, so it's a matter of agreeing on the meaning, there's no right or wrong. For {mutce} I use {-tce} but for {mleca} I prefer {mec-}.
Of course I've no problem with {rodme'a} as {ko'a mleca ko'e lo ka broda kei ko'i} but it has exactly the same sumti places as {mecybo'e} (as defined in my previous message).
Yes, but he wasn't talking about lujvo in general, he was talking about jvajvo, which is a special class of lujvo that follows predictable patterns. mecbo'e does not follow these predicatble patterns and so are naljvajvo - not regular- whereas rodme'a do and are.
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )