On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Pierre Abbat
<phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Sunday 07 November 2010 16:06:23 Jonathan Jones wrote:
> Or, to more closely reflect the order of the English:
>
> la.sam. seme'e lo mi pendo ku gerku
This sounds a bit strange. You're adding a place for something which has a
name to the predicate "gerku": "Sam is a dog with my friend being named." I'd
say "la sam. noi pendo mi cu gerku".
I like that better.
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Jonathan Jones <
eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> > lo mi pendo me'e la.sam. gerku
That should be "me'e zo .sam.". Otherwise you're saying that Sam himself is a
name, which he isn't. Also "me'e zo sam" is adding an extra place
to "gerku": "My friend is a dog named Sam". If you mean "My friend named Sam
is a dog", that's "lo mi pendo be me'e zo .sam. gerku".
Pierre
--
Don't buy a French car in Holland. It may be a citroen.
I don't think the with(out) {be} distinction matters.