The current file with lujvo, NORALUJV.txt, defines the place structure of lujvo {fetspe} "wife" and {nakspe} "husband" as
fetspe
fetsi+speni: wife: x1 = speni1 (married) = fetsi1 (female), x2 = speni3
nakspe
nakni+speni: husband: x1 = speni1 (married) = nakni1 (male), x2 = speni3
Is it correct that the second sumti is speni3, i.e. married "under law/custom/tradition/system/convention"?
It is obvious that x2 = speni2 would be much more appropriate.
I haven't yet studied the art of defining the lujvo place structure.
Is the above a mistake?
I would like to use {le fetspe be mi} for "my wife", instead of {le mi fetspe} which now is the only option left for me :)
Yanis Batura
Happy Learner of Lojban