[lojban-beginners] Re: ok, lambda/currying-geeks needed (was Re: Re: "Once More")

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On 12/14/05, Sunnan <sunnan@handgranat.org> wrote:
> BTW, xorxes, are su'i and vu'u what Haskell programmers would call
> "curried"?

What would you do with them if they were? {li su'i pa} is grammatical,
but I would take it to be just {li pa}. I don't remember this ever being
dealt with however.

> If not, then a lambda wrapping of sorts might be needed, how
> is that done in lojban?

In "normal" lojban, you can refer to a property with {ka} and using
{ce'u} in the open slots. In MEX, I don't know.

> I still haven't learned the mekso system but that's something I really
> want to do.

I don't like lojban mekso very much, I try to avoid them as much as
possible.

mu'o mi'e xorxes