[lojban-beginners] Re: Interaction of {na} and {su'o}

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On 12/7/06, Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com> wrote:
> A sentence on jsk ( http://www.teddyb.org/jsk/showpost.php?post=565 ),
> "Every pig is an animal, but not every animal is a pig", has the
> proposed translation {.i ro xarju cu danlu .i ku'i su'o danlu na
> xarju}.
>
> That made me think, since I'm not really clear about how {na}
> interacts with things.

There are different schools on that.

> Would that mean that {ro danlu na xarju} and/or {naku ro danlu cu
> xarju} and/or {naku zo'u ro danlu cu xarju} would be better?

I prefer {me'i ro} for the "not all" quantifier, so: {me'i ro danlu cu xarju}

> What about {su'o danlu cu na'e xarju}?

That has the same truth value, yes.

mu'o mi'e xorxes