[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: Interaction of {na} and {su'o}



On 12/7/06, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/7/06, Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would that mean that {ro danlu na xarju} and/or {naku ro danlu cu
> xarju} and/or {naku zo'u ro danlu cu xarju} would be better?

I prefer {me'i ro} for the "not all" quantifier, so: {me'i ro danlu cu xarju}

Ah, that cleverly avoids the problem with negation. Thanks.

Would one or more of the suggestions I made be possible, too? (Or does
that depend on which school of thought one subscribes to?)

mu'o mi'e .filip.
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>