Turniansky, Michael [UNK] schrieb:
> ... That's why la ja.jak.rusol is not
> allowed, because "ja" isn't a cmevla
Lurking, wondering, now asking:
Is it necessary to lojbanize "name clusters" bit by bit? Wouldn't
jajak. rusol. be acceptable?
Yes, as is {janjak.}
On a related note, what should be done with that French dictionary?
Blarus? Lyrus?
Under the current system, I would go with {lyrus.}, {liarus.}, or {luarus.}. Under the proposed system, with a pause preceding names in all situations, {.larus.} would be acceptable.
mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan