[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban-beginners] About {mi cu facki di'e}
Sorry to interject, but just so I understand:
Define a rafsi R1 to be M1+C1, with M1 being an established cmavo such as {na} and C1 being a consonant, and define another rafsi R2 whose first consonant is C2. If C1+R2 is morphologically acceptable, then to form lujvo R1+R2 we need a y in between C1 and C2, even if C1+C2 is an acceptable consonant cluster, to avoid fragmentation into M1 C1+R2?
Please pardon my horrible abuse of the addition operator, heh.
mu'omi'e latros.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Pierre Abbat
<phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Monday 19 April 2010 01:37:24 MorphemeAddict wrote:
> And it should be "najynimre", eh?
"cn" and "jm" and "cm" are valid initial pairs, but "jn" is not. So "jnimre"
is not a lujvo, so you don't have to add "y" to "najnimre" to avoid a
tosmabru. "cr" but not "jr" is also a valid initial.
Pierre
--
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.