[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
jbovlaste lujvo definitions -- opinions wanted.
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: jbovlaste lujvo definitions -- opinions wanted.
- From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 10:40:41 -0700
- Mail-followup-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
In http://www.lojban.org/jbovlaste/help/definitions.html
I tell people to write definitions like
d_1=b_1 bitches/whines/expresses anguish about d_2 with
utterance/sound(s) b_2
rather than
x_2=d_1=b_1 bitches/whines/expresses anguish about x_2=d_2 with
utterance/sound(s) x_3=b_2
I have since decided that the latter is more readable, because it lets
the reader know at a glance how many places there are, and which place
is where, without having to count them.
Before changing the help and asking people to change their definitions,
I'd like to see what people on the list think. Do you prefer one over
the other? If you prefer the second form, should "x_1" always be used,
or the first letter of the lujvo, or a series of letters representing
the lujvo ("bd_1" in the case of ba'urdu'u) ?
Thanks.
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi