On Jun 9, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Jorge Llambías wrote:
On 6/9/06, Maxim Katcharov <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com> wrote:For example, I think that the following is grammatical under your rules, but I find the interpretation infeasible (or awkward), since it uses both "markers": lu'o ro lo tadni cu sruri lo dinjuFor me that's equivalent to {lu'o lo ro lo tadni} and it marks the slot that the sumti fills as non-distributive. It is only the outermost markerthat concerns the distributivity of the slot.
Could someone explain the use of {lo} twice here? I've never seen such a thing
before, and would have expected it to be ungrammatical. ki'e mu'o mi'e .aleks.