On 11/6/06, Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's good enough that we have recognition. When you vary so much that
> those who know Lojban extremely well can't recognize it, that's a lot
> more than making a slight difference that is still recognizable.
LoKaDiN's WriTiNg StYLe mAy Be A biT FuNkY, pErHaPs eVeN jArRiNg,
bUt I DoUbT tHaT aNyBoDy WiTh A MiNiMuM oF kNoWLeDgE aBoUt
LoJbAn, LeT aLoNe ThOsE wHo KnOw iT ExTrEmELy WeLL, CoULd
hAvE aNy TrOuBLe ReCoGniZiNg iT. sUrELy LoJbAn iS mOrE rObUsT
tHaN tHaT!
Mu'O Mi'E xOrXeS
.i.ui.ua.i'o.u'isai .i la'edi'u jEtnu zo'onai
ni'oni'o
Date:
Nov 6, 2006 2:05 PM
Subject: [lojban] Re: livejournal discrimination
I think it is kind of interesting that in theory, if lojban is written
down the same way it is spoken, which is what I always thought, that
one might use no spaces, but still capitalise for stress. Then it
really would be written down in the way that it was spoken, and that
would be wonderful. As for those of you that find it difficult to
read, I think that it could become, with practice, much easier,
because, you could, by looking at the shape of a sentence, and just a
few letters, know what the sentence was, providing it didn't contain
names.
.i.uasai.ila'edi'useprIjeki'ulenudoze'ubazgAna
ni'oni'o