[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule
From: Timothy Hobbs <tim.thelion@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:06:01 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=kq6IiKWoJ0qjmq4GjMHldVQQ5qWSmoHO8QvAWiOZAT8W6w2encU/ptPMVC/yC2v1krt7F0m4bq8TH7BoYwbqmgpZooyKzwjCIJp3qh5WhqFRfuhNrtjXVoFZwmSKnwma3RpyNuxNSzvNukZLyr15WRtpIk0nEh9OMXaoTc69cdQ=
In-reply-to: <4558F37D.9070003@kli.org> (Mark E. Shoulson's message of "Mon\, 13 Nov 2006 17\:36\:45 -0500")
References: <20061113204805.48815.qmail@web81309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4558E466.80006@lojban.org> <525A773F-A307-43AF-9603-3E18C02C42FA@mac.com> <4558F37D.9070003@kli.org>
Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

what is the difference, with xorexes, between la parma and lo parma?  If there are non, then gismu should not follow la, so that problem would not occur.

References:
- Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule
  - From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule
  - From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule
  - From: Robert McIvor <rmcivor@mac.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule
  - From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <mark@kli.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule
Next by Date: jbovlaste access
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread