Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule

["Mark E. Shoulson" <mark@kli.org>]

Robert McIvor wrote:

> And the rule was altered to cover the LaPlace situation. I believe the 
> current solution allows unambiguous parsing of names (in Loglan), and 
> has only the restriction that names end with a consonant and a pause.
I'm still not fully understanding how the new Loglan rule covers all 
cases. What about someone named, say {parmalagan}? Is {la parmalagan} a 
single person, or is it {la parma la gan}, two sumti, the first being LA 
on a hypothetical predicate {parma}?

~mark