On 13 Nov, 2006, at 17:36, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
Robert McIvor wrote:I'm still not fully understanding how the new Loglan rule covers all cases. What about someone named, say {parmalagan}? Is {la parmalagan} a single person, or is it {la parma la gan}, two sumti, the first being LA on a hypothetical predicate {parma}?And the rule was altered to cover the LaPlace situation. I believe the current solution allows unambiguous parsing of names (in Loglan), and has only the restriction that names end with a consonant and a pause.
la parmalagan would be la Parmalagan, because la parma would need to be followed by a pause to be la parma la gan
~markTo unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list- request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or ifyou're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.