[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: "la" rule



I'm a bit mystified as to why this is provoking such debate and such arcane workarounds. Is it not the case that Mark years ago proposed changing the phonemic composition of {la, lai, doi} to {la., lai., doi.}? That change is simple and linguistically unproblematic, so the BPFK has a simple choice between introducing it or sticking with the current prescription.

--And.