Timo Paulssen wrote:
> i think two {na} refering to the same work like one (ie the second one
> overrides the first one)
whoops, the CLL (chapter 15) says otherwise:
The grammar of ``na'' allows multiple adjacent negations, which cancel
out, as in normal logic:
2.11) ti na na barda prenu co
melbi mi
This [false] [false] is-a-big person
that is (beautiful to me).
which is the same as:
2.12) ti barda prenu co melbi mi
This is a big-person that is (beautiful to me).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature