[lojban] Re: Fw: bridi tail negation

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Lindar Greenwood
<lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>  {.i na'e se zanfri fa lonu zutse ne'i le ricyzda gi'e na tavla}?
>
> I have nothing helpful to contribute other than pointing out that you didn't need to explicitly mark {fa} if you used {se}.
> It isn't wrong, it's just redundant.

Actually, he wouldn't need "fa" if he hadn't used "se". With "se", he
does need "fa" because he sent the place he wants to fill, originally
x2, to x1.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.