Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: Translation: "The Man and the Snake", by Ambrose Bierce, (continued)
  • Re: Translation: "The Man and the Snake", by Ambrose Bierce, Jordan DeLong
• Re: [lojban] Re: Translation: "The Man and the Snake", by Ambrose Bierce, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Translation: "The Man and the Snake", by Ambrose Bierce, Jordan DeLong
  • Re: [lojban] Re: Translation: "The Man and the Snake", by Ambrose Bierce, Pierre Abbat
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [lojban] Re: Translation: "The Man and the Snake", by Ambrose Bierce, Jorge Llambias
• [lojban] Re: The "Vote for Nick" platform, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: The "Vote for Nick" platform, Jordan DeLong
  • [lojban] afterthought prenexes (was: RE: Re: The "Vote for Nick" platform, And Rosta
  • Re: [lojban] Re: The "Vote for Nick" platform, Robin Lee Powell
    • Re: [lojban] Re: The "Vote for Nick" platform, Robert LeChevalier
      • Re: The "Vote for Nick" platform, Jordan DeLong
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [lojban] Re: The "Vote for Nick" platform, Jorge Llambias
• Re: [lojban] Re: [llg-members] Official Statement- LLG Board approvesnew baseline policy, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: [lojban] Re: [llg-members] Official Statement- LLG Board approvesnew baseline policy, Nick Nicholas
    • Re: [lojban] Re: [llg-members] Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Pierre Abbat
• [lojban] Comments on the New Policy, And Rosta
  • Re: Comments on the New Policy, Jordan DeLong
  • Re: [lojban] Comments on the New Policy, Robert LeChevalier
    • RE: [lojban] Comments on the New Policy, And Rosta
• Re: [lojban] Fu'ivla diphthongs was: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robert LeChevalier
  • Re: [lojban] Fu'ivla diphthongs was: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Pierre Abbat
    • Re: [lojban] Fu'ivla diphthongs was: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robert LeChevalier
      • Re: [lojban] Fu'ivla diphthongs, Pierre Abbat
• [lojban] word resolution algorithm, Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group
  • Re: [lojban] word resolution algorithm, Pierre Abbat
  • Re: [lojban] word resolution algorithm, Lionel Vidal
• Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Avital Oliver
  • Re: [lojban] Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Avital Oliver
  • Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Jordan DeLong
  • Re: [lojban] Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojbanmade me think more clearly, Invent Yourself
    • RE: [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojbanmade me think more clearly, Craig
    • Re: [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Avital Oliver
  • Re: [lojban] Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Theodore Reed
• Re: [lojban] Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: OfficialStatement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jorge Llambias
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jordan DeLong
  • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
    • [lojban] BP & unintelligible cmavo (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
    • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robert LeChevalier
      • Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jordan DeLong
      • Prayers to Lord Zipf (was: Why we should cancel the vote or all voteNO (was Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy)), Invent Yourself
      • RE: [lojban] Prayers to Lord Zipf (was: Why we should cancel the vote or all voteNO (was Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy)), And Rosta
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (wasRE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Invent Yourself
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jordan DeLong
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Logical Language Group, Inc.
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO, John Cowan
      • Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jordan DeLong
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robin Lee Powell
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, John Cowan
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robert LeChevalier
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policRO, John Cowan
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Logical Language Group, Inc.
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Logical Language Group, Inc.
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jordan DeLong
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robert McIvor
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robert McIvor
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (wasRE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Invent Yourself
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, sbelknap
• [lojban] Loglan, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: [lojban] Loglan, Steven Belknap
    • Re: [lojban] Loglan, Robert LeChevalier
      • RE: [lojban] Loglan, And Rosta
      • RE: [lojban] Loglan, Robert LeChevalier
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert McIvor
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, John Cowan
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert LeChevalier
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert McIvor
      • Re: [lojban] Loglan, Steven Belknap
      • RE: [lojban] Loglan, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Loglan, Steven Belknap
      • Re: [lojban] Loglan, Robert LeChevalier
    • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Invent Yourself
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Steven Belknap
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Invent Yourself
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Steven Belknap
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Invent Yourself
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Steven Belknap
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert LeChevalier
      • [lojban] net presence (was: RE: Re: Loglan, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert McIvor
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Loglan, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robin Lee Powell
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Loglan, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Steven Belknap
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robin Lee Powell
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert McIvor
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert LeChevalier
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert McIvor
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert McIvor
      • Re: Loglan, Jordan DeLong
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, John Cowan